Close Menu
    Support Us
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About
    • Authors
    • Store
    • Spanish
    • Contact
    Al Jumuah MagazineAl Jumuah Magazine
    • Home
    • Quran
      • Commentary
      • Sciences
    • Sunnah
      • commentary
      • Sciences
    • Character
    • Advice
      • Family
      • Society
    • Thoughts
    • Discover islam
    • Hajj FAQs
    HAJJ
    Support Us
    Al Jumuah MagazineAl Jumuah Magazine
    Home»Fiqh»How Much Of The Quran Did The Prophet Interpret?
    Fiqh Quran Thoughts

    How Much Of The Quran Did The Prophet Interpret?

    ‘Abd Al-Salam ‘Abd Al-ShafiBy ‘Abd Al-Salam ‘Abd Al-Shafi8 Mins Read
    How Much of the Quran Did the Prophet Interpret? - Scholars Opinion
    Share
    Facebook Twitter WhatsApp Pinterest LinkedIn Email

    Summary

    The article discusses the differing scholarly views on how much of the Qur’an Prophet Muhammad ﷺ explained to his Companions, presenting arguments for both complete and partial interpretation, and addressing attempts to reconcile these positions.

    THERE ARE TWO scholarly opinions as to how much of the Quran the Prophet explained.

    The First Opinion: The Entire Quran

    Some scholars, like Shaykh Al-Islâm Ibn Taymiyyah, held that the Prophet had explained the meanings of the entire Quran to his Companions. The following are some of the proofs they adduced in support of their view:
    1. Allah’s saying: Thus to you, O Prophet, We have sent down the Quran as a final reminder of God’s way, so that you make clear to all people the word of God that has come down to them, and so that they may reflect on it and be guided [Sûrat Al-Naḥl, 16:44].
    2. The report transmitted on the authority of Abû ʿAbd Al-Raḥmân Al-Sulami who said: Our Quran teachers from among the Companions—like ʿUthmân ibn ʿAffân, and ʿAbdullâh ibn Masʿûd—told us that they would take 10 âyat of the Quran at a time and study them thoroughly, extracting the ʿilm and legal injunctions couched in them, then move to the next 10 âyât. This approach, they added, enabled us to understand the meanings of the Quran and observe its legal dictates.
    3. If it is not conceivable that a people will read a book, any book, without understanding its meanings, then what about the Quran, the Book of God on which people’s salvation in the hereafter and their success in this world depend!?
    4. There is a report narrated by Imam Aḥmad to the effect that the Prophet died before explaining the meaning of the âyah on riba (usury). This, they argue, indicates that the Prophet was in the habit of explaining the meanings of the Quran.

    Rebuttals of the Arguments of the First Group

    1. The cited âyah from Sûrat Al-Naḥl (16:44) does not indicate that the Prophet had interpreted the entire Quran. In fact, the âyah itself says that Muslims are required to ponder over the âyât of the Quran “so that they may reflect on it.”
    2. The report from Abû ʿAbd Al-Raḥman Al-Sulami does not attest to the opponent’s claim. For it doesn’t tell us how much time it took those Companions to memorize the 10 âyât. Besides, those Companions, being intimately acquainted with the Arabic language—they were native speakers of Arabic language at a time when the Arabs’ command of their native language had not yet slackened—could make out, unaided, the sense of much of the âyât of the Quran.
    3. Their argument that the Prophet died before imparting to his Companions the meaning of the âyah on riba does not sustain the opponent’s position. In fact, the very same ḥadîth indicates that the Prophet did not explain to his Companions the meanings of the entire Quran.Moreover, Ibn Taymiyyah himself, in a statement he made on the best approach to tafsîr, had indirectly alluded to the fact that the Prophet did not explain all the âyât of the Quran. He said: “The best exegetical method is to explain the Quran with the aid of other passages of the Quran (inter-textual interpretation). Then in the next place comes the interpretation of the Quran with the aid of the Sunnah of the Prophet. And when both the Quran and the Sunnah do not avail in the interpretation of a certain âyah, recourse must be had to the statements of the Prophet’s Companions. But if help can’t be had from the Quran or from the Sunnah or from the statements of the Companions, then, in this case one should consult the sayings of Quran exegetes from the Tâbiʿîn Generation, like Mujâhid ibn Jabr.”

    The Second Opinion: Some Verses Only

    Other scholars, like Sûyûṭi, maintained that the Prophet did not explain the meanings of all the âyât of the Quran. Rather, he interpreted only some few âyât. The following are some of the arguments advanced by this group in support of their opinion.
    1. This report was narrated by Al-Bazzâr on the authority of ʿÂishah, who said: “The Prophet was not in the habit of explicating the meanings of the Quran. He, rather, discoursed on the meanings of some âyât, which he learned from the archangel Jibrîl.”
    2. The idea that the Prophet’s had elucidated the meanings of the âyât of the entire Quran is unfeasible.
    3. Had the Prophet clarified the meanings of the entire Quran, he would not have made his famous duʿâ’ in behalf of Ibn ʿAbbâs: “O Allah, endow him (Ibn ʿAbbâs) with deep understanding of religion and of Quran exegesis.”

    Answering the arguments of the second group

    1. The ḥadîth they argued from (on the authority of Âishah) was declared by Ḥadîth experts (muḥadîthun, ‘traditionists’) as both munkar–literally this term means ‘denounced’; technically ‘munkar’ refers to a ḥadîth reported by a weak narrator–and gharîb (a ḥadîth conveyed through a solitary chain of narrators), because it was transmitted by Muhammad ibn Jaʿfar Al-Zubayri, a ḥadîth narrator with an impugned integrity.
    2. It is untenable to assert that the Prophet’s interpretation of some of the âyât of the Quran is possible while also maintaining that his explanation of the entire Quran is impracticable.
    3. The third proof—even if, for argument’s sake, taken as indicative of the Prophet’s expounding of the meanings of the entire Quran—it may not be considered as evidence that the Prophet had explained the meanings of only some few âyât of the Quran.

    An Attempt at Reconciling the Two Opinions: Verses Needing Explanation

    Imâm Ibn Jarîr Al-Ṭabari narrated on the authority of ʿAbdullâh ibn ʿAbbâs, who said:

    Tafsîr is of four types:

    1) A tafsîr people conversant with Arabic language know;

    2) a tafsîr only the scholars know;

    3) a tafsîr everyone must know; and

    4) a tafsîr only Allah knows.

    Judging by the foregoing statement of Ibn ʿAbbâs, one can say that the Prophet did not tell his Companions about the meanings of the Quranic âyât whose denotations can be understood by Arabic language speakers –#1. They themselves were all Arabic-speakers and would not need such explanation. Also, the Prophet did not explicate the meanings of the âyât whose significances are so self-evident that everyone should know them (no Muslim can have an excuse for not knowing the meanings of these âyât)—#3. Muslims of his time lived in the Prophet’s community and knew by experience what they needed to know. Needless to say that the Prophet did not tell his Companions about the meanings of the âyât touching on matters whose knowledge is the exclusive preserve of Allah, such as the âyât that talk about the exact timing of the Hour of Judgment (Al-Sâʿah)–#4. However, the Prophet was able to elaborate on the meanings of some âyât that treated of some matters that belong in the realm of the unseen (ʿâlam al-ghayb). The Prophet also explained to his Companions much of the âyât that are subsumed under Category #2 of Ibn ʿAbbâs—the âyât whose meanings are known only to scholars who employ ijtihâd to perform the following interpretive tasks: bayân al-mujmal (providing detail for the abridged statements); takhṣîṣ al-ʿâm (specifying the general); taqyîd al-muṭlaq (qualifying the absolute); tawḍîḥ al-mushkil (clarifying the complicated by sorting out its components); etc. It is because of the Prophet teaching certain leaders-to-be, that this knowledge has come down to us.

    Conclusion

    The extensive body of commentary—available to Arabic-proficient, trained scholars—answers many questions raised in the minds of those who would today seriously read and ponder the Quran.  These works have discussed and re-discussed the foundational issues, often in depth, that the Muslim community needs be concerned with.  

    Frequently Asked Question

    Answering the most relevant questions to help you better understand the article.

    What are the two main scholarly opinions on this topic?

    One view holds that the Prophet ﷺ explained the meanings of the entire Qur’an; another asserts he explained only some verses.

    Which scholars support the opinion that the Prophet ﷺ explained the whole Qur’an?

    Scholars such as Shaykh al-Islâm Ibn Taymiyyah are cited as holding that the Prophet ﷺ explained the meanings of the entire Qur’an.

     

    What verse is cited by proponents of complete interpretation?

    Sūrat al-Naḥl (16:44) is cited, commanding the Prophet ﷺ to clarify God’s word for the people.

    What report about Companions studying the Qur’an is mentioned?

    A report from Abū ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Sulamī describes Companions studying ten āyāt at a time to extract meanings and legal rulings.

    How is the report about the Prophet ﷺ explaining the verse on riba used?

    Supporters argue it shows he was in the habit of explanation; critics say it indicates he did not explain every verse.

    What evidence do supporters of partial interpretation cite?

    They cite a report attributed to ʿÂishah saying the Prophet ﷺ discoursed on meanings of some āyāt taught by Jibrīl.

    How do critics of the partial view assess that ḥadīth from ʿÂishah?

    Hadīth experts declared it weak (munkar) and isolated (gharīb) due to its sole transmission through a questionable narrator.

    What is argued about the feasibility of explaining all verses?

    One argument says it would be unfeasible; another response asserts refutation of partial-only claims makes such distinction untenable.

    Who is cited with a statement categorizing types of tafsīr?

    Ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī is cited relating four kinds of tafsīr known by language speakers, scholars, all Muslims, or only Allah.

    How does the article conclude regarding interpretation by the Prophet ﷺ?

    The article summarizes that extensive scholarly commentary complements what was taught, with some verses needing scholarly exposition beyond the Prophet’s direct explanation.

    Previous ArticleWhy Scholars Disagree (1)
    Next Article The Signs Granted to Prophet Isa (A.S)
    ‘Abd Al-Salam ‘Abd Al-Shafi

    Related Posts

    Niyyah in Islam: How Your Intention Shapes Every Act of Worship

    By Al Jumuah Staff
    Read More

    Islamic Views of TAHRIF and Orthodox Judaism’s View Of ORAL LAW

    By Rabbi Allen S Maller
    Read More

    Can We Really Judge a 7th-Century Man by Today’s Standards?

    By Salma Chaudhary
    Read More

    The Umbrellas of Madinah: An Engineering Marvel that Provides Shade and Tranquility for Countless Pilgrims

    By Sajida Fakhri
    Read More

    Are You a Complete Muslim? | Part 13

    By Munira Al-Mawdi
    Read More

    Shurah and Democracy: A Conceptual Analysis

    By Jaafir Idris
    Read More

    3 Comments

    1. Shahida Banu on September 17, 2015 6:41 pm

      No more opinions please, had enough already

      Reply
    2. Abid Qayyum Choudhry on September 18, 2015 5:15 am

      I LOVE the noble QURAN

      Reply
    3. Wittrock on December 7, 2019 5:34 am

      Thank you for sharing this info, I truly liked your storytelling fashion.
      As a practicing writer, I have always adopted a instinctive logic it felt normal
      to focus on the topic -> come up with ideas/answers -> put it in your newspaper.
      Yet, nothing can save me when I was writing concerning
      thermodynamics, for instance, that, as you can imagine, is not my
      main field of experience. Anyway, I took some great tips from your writing style, thanks for that)

      Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

    Recent Comments
    • Muzammil on Zukhraful Qawlal Ghuroor – When Sins Are Beautifully Presented, Deception is Easy: “Clear”
    • qassim ouma akoko on Monotheistic Pilgrimage: The Ka’bah and Bait Al-Muqaddas / Beit HaMiqdash: “be blessed”
    • Abubakar on Having Guests? Host from the Heart – Caring with Islamic Etiquette: “A beautiful reminder that true hospitality in Islam is not about luxury, but about kindness, generosity, and sincere care for…”
    • A Muslim man on Unveiling The Hûr Al-‘În | Part 1: “Okay, look men are creepy and most of you women don’t have to deal with men in Jannah so the…”
    • Jacqui DeLorenzo on The Spirituality of Ramadan and Fasting: “This is a deeply thoughtful and enriching exploration of the spirituality of Ramadan and fasting. I truly appreciate how the…”
    Menu
    • About
    • Contact
    • Authors
    • Spanish
    • Store
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Copyright © 2026 Al Jumuah Magazine

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.